Delete tombstoned objects if mismatched access rights. Details Diff. Escalate priviledges if maschine name matches. Show Obsolete 2 View All Add an attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc. In that case the issues showed up at an increased rate, because apparently the DHCP server used by the clients was configured to issue dynamic leases. During the UCS 4. That way, the bind9 nameserver doesn't find them any longer as PTR records. Problem is that the obejcts ntsecuritydescriptor still says that the object belongs to the client that initially registered it.
A mechanism like that could also help us resolve systematic problems like the one in Bug and in Bug Then its ok. And check again for zone transfer logs. Please let me know the results. SivaKumar the telnet connection port 53 to Master and Slave is working well. Hi, Apologies for my grave mistake. The command should be. Also in your named. Please put the complete zone name like this. Also please try this. From the slave server.
Does it show complete zone data zone tranfer?. Please let me know the resuls. This happens when the client PC is not predefined in forward and reverse zone files and DHCP is supposed to send the data. Reverse file gets updated, forward file is not modified. When client asks DHCP for address, this happens, according to named. If you look closely on who is requesting what, you can see my problem, update request for 0. And of course, security policy in named.
I can easily fix this problem by changing named. I am looking for better answer. Why is reverse file request processed as from localhost and forward file as from client's IP and how to fix it?
Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams?
Learn more. Asked 5 years, 2 months ago. Active 5 years, 2 months ago. Viewed times.
0コメント